|
|
Post by Mordecai Khavl on May 24, 2005 8:59:53 GMT -5
so...what did u think?
|
|
|
|
Post by Alec Morshwyn on May 24, 2005 18:34:32 GMT -5
Plot: 9/10
Action: 9/10
Complete coolness: 9/10
Acting: ....is -1038 an option?
Okay, so I thought the movie was really good...if you overlook the acting. I mean, it's Star Wars, what did ya expect, but still...the acting in III was particularly bad. Beyond that, good movie.
|
|
Hawk
Government Agent 
Posts: 17
|
Post by Hawk on May 24, 2005 22:13:30 GMT -5
I thought it was pretty much the same as I and II as far as acting. Most everyone was OK, nothing special. Sameul Jackson and Ewan McGregor (Mace Windu and Obi Wan) were good. Natalie Portman and Hayden Christiansen sucked. Especially Portman. Gag me with a sthingy  |
|
Ty Brudzneck
Resistance Member
Do you like nachos?
Posts: 23
|
Post by Ty Brudzneck on Jun 8, 2005 10:04:06 GMT -5
it was cool action wise. like every one else i despise hadyen and portman, even samuel jackson wasnt as good as normal. i think of the newest three it is the 2nd best. the best in my opinion being episode 1. i just love darth maul. it also seems like there was much more time put into it. + no hayden christiansesn! but over all i think it was like a 8
|
|
